THE EDUCATORS' PEN
CBS LINE
Volume 4(9)
AI in Indian Judiciary: Prospectus and Challenges
The Indian justice
system is currently undergoing the crisis of huge backlog in terms of disposal
of cases both criminal and civil in nature in all levels of courts that is from
Supreme Court to lower courts. In the top court, The Supreme Court of India has
over 83,312 cases, of which 10,094 cases has been pending for 10 years, 558
cases for 20 years and 26 cases for 30 years. Roughly 80% of cases are civil in
nature while around 21% of the cases are criminal in nature. The condition of
high courts and lower courts are much worse with over 5.8 million cases to be
disposed. Some experts argued that, even after 100 years the backlog faced by
Indian Judiciary in all levels cannot be solved. So in this context the entry
of Artificial Intelligence becomes an interesting solution to completely clear
the backlog in the system.
Deep learning,
natural language processing, and neural networks are just a few of the many
components that make up artificial intelligence. Face recognition software on
Android smartphones frequently uses deep learning, a subfield of artificial
intelligence that deals with data representation in a hierarchy employing many
levels of neural networks. The capacity to read, comprehends, interpret, and
generate human languages is referred to as natural language processing (NLP),
and it is employed in voice control and smartphone command prompts. Neural networks, on the other hand, are based
on neural connections seen in the human brain that function as a systematic
model. Algorithms used in artificial intelligence enable a machine to think,
learn, and solve problems in a manner like to that of the human brain.
China has implemented Artificial Intelligence in its legal system
through the Smart Court Navigation System, which aids judges in managing
caseloads by transcribing documents, reviewing evidence, and suggesting
recommendations based on past cases. Brazil's Supreme Federal Court introduced
MarlA, an AI system that summarizes lawsuits and generates procedural reports
for judges. Additionally, Buenos Aires developed Prometea AI, capable of making
decisions in 20 seconds with 96% accuracy and translating documents into
multiple languages. The USA utilizes the COMPAS system to assess the risk of
reoffending among criminals. In India, for translating English legal documents
into nine regional languages, the Supreme Court developed an AI-based system
named SUVAS, along with a multi-lingual app approved by the Supreme Court and
National Informatics Centre. The system translates documents into six regional
languages in addition to English and Hindi. Additionally, on April 6, 2021,
Chief Justice S.A. Bobde launched the SUPACE system, aimed at reducing judges'
workload by processing legal information necessary for case hearings.
Currently, it is being tested at the Bombay and Delhi High Courts for criminal
cases.
Benefits
· Judges can easily locate pertinent legislation, case law summaries, and precedents with the use of SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court Efficiency).
· By translating court rulings into regional languages, translation systems such as SUVAS (Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software) make legal information more accessible to a wider range of people.
· Accurate digital records of witness depositions and court proceedings are produced by AI-driven real-time transcribing systems. Litigants can structure their filings with the aid of chatbots and digital filling portals.
· Farber (2025) evaluated three AI tools—ChatGPT-4, Claude, and Gemini—in analyzing crime scene photographs compared to ten forensic experts. The AI achieved an average reliability rating of 7.4 out of 10, significantly reducing analysis time to under two minutes versus 42.5 minutes for human experts. The study highlighted the AI tools' effectiveness in observational accuracy (7.6 out of 10) and logical inference (7.4 out of 10).
· The predictive policing system, such as COMPAS in the US, faces criticism for racial discrimination, particularly against the black community, which is often labeled as high-risk compared to their white counterparts.
· Additionally, these systems raise concerns about potential biases against minorities and marginalized groups.
· Privacy issues linked to mass surveillance and risks of exploitation for personal gain by political leaders and activists further complicate the situation.
· The emergence of deep fakes adds another layer of complexity, undermining trust in legal proceedings as AI can generate misleading content, making verification of authenticity a challenging and resource-intensive process.
Conclusion
The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) should be to assist judges,
promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability. Its deployment requires
clear government parameters to prevent misuse for personal gain. AI must
enhance speed, efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility, particularly for
marginalized groups in India. Transitioning from backlog to efficiency poses
challenges that necessitate safeguards and a commitment to constitutional
integrity. Successful AI implementation will rely on decisions by policymakers,
judges, technologists, and civil society, as India seeks to wisely leverage
AI's potential.
References
Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., & Ehret, B. (2008). Evaluating the
predictive validity of the compas risk and needs assessment system. Criminal
Justice and Behavior, 36(1), 21–40.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808326545
Beruashvili, M. (2025). The Capabilities and Challenges of Artificial
Intelligence in the Justice System. Law and World, 11(3),
142–153. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.3.10
Carrasquilla-Díaz, L., De Luque-Pisciotti, A., & Lagos-González, E.
(2024). AI Adoption in Colombian Legal Practice: Challenges and Opportunities. Procedia
Computer Science, 241(6), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.072
Dario, L. M., Morrow, W. J., Wooditch, A., & Vickovic, S. G. (2015).
The point break effect: an examination of surf, crime, and transitory
opportunities. Criminal Justice Studies, 28(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601x.2015.1032409
De Sanctis, F. M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Innovation in
Brazilian Justice. International Annals of Criminology, 59(1),
1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2021.4
Farber, S. (2025). AI as a decision support tool in forensic image
analysis: A pilot study on integrating large language models into crime scene
investigation workflows. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70035
Ghosh, M., & Thirugnanam, A. (2021).
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Big Data, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0415-7_2
Jain, P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and
Effective Justice Delivery in India. SSRN, 2018
CBS LINE
Comments
Post a Comment